LPLPlay In Knockouts
EDWARD GAMING vs Shenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMAS - LPL
Aug 28, 06:00·Bo5
Sign in to track this pick
Series Predictions
EDWARD GAMINGShenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMAS
FastTree
· free model
EDWARD GAMING26.4%
Shenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMAS73.6%
Head-to-Head & Form
EDward GamingElo Rating
1447
Tournament Record
–
Overall Record
63W - 83L (43.2%)
Current Streak
4L
H2H Win Rate
42.8%
VS
Ninjas in PyjamasElo Rating
1715
Tournament Record
–
Overall Record
108W - 96L (52.9%)
Current Streak
1L
H2H Win Rate
57.2%
Main Prediction Drivers
Impact = how much this feature shifts the model's win probability. The value below each name is how much better the favored team is on that feature.
1
Expected Win RateExpected Win RateThe model's expected win probability based on Elo difference alone.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +32.4% expected WR
Impact
25.7%
Ninjas in Pyjamas
2
Elo Rating
Ninjas in Pyjamas +268 Elo
Impact
25.6%
Ninjas in Pyjamas
3
Early GameEarly GameA combined early-game signal blending gold, CS, and XP differentials at the 15-minute mark.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +137
Ninjas in Pyjamas leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward EDward Gaming.
Impact
21.7%
Counts for EDward Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
4
Team StrengthTeam StrengthA combined team strength signal blending overall win rate, KDA, and gold per minute.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +1030
Impact
7.4%
Ninjas in Pyjamas
5
Elo CompositeElo CompositeA combined Elo signal that blends raw Elo, expected win rate, and the interaction between them.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +87
Impact
4.8%
Ninjas in Pyjamas
6
Upset RateUpset RateHow often this team wins as the Elo underdog - captures clutch factor / ability to beat stronger teams.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +10.7%
Impact
3.8%
Ninjas in Pyjamas
7
Opponent Avg Elo
EDward Gaming +0
EDward Gaming leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward Ninjas in Pyjamas.
Impact
3.3%
Counts for Ninjas in Pyjamas
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
8
Win Rate
Ninjas in Pyjamas +9.8% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward EDward Gaming.
Impact
2%
Counts for EDward Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
9
Win Streak
Ninjas in Pyjamas +3 games
Ninjas in Pyjamas leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward EDward Gaming.
Impact
1.4%
Counts for EDward Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
10
Schedule StrengthSchedule StrengthThe average Elo of opponents this team has faced. A 60% win rate against strong opponents is more impressive than against weak ones.
Ninjas in Pyjamas +0.096
Ninjas in Pyjamas leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward EDward Gaming.
Impact
1.3%
Counts for EDward Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
Scouting Report
EDward Gaming
BLUE
Well-rounded profile
Ninjas in Pyjamas
RED
Higher rated overall
Stronger win record (53%)
Cleaner teamfighting (better KDA)
Better gold generation
Stronger early game (gold lead at 15)