PCSKnockouts
SillySilly Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster Academy - PCS
Sep 5, 09:00·Bo5
Make this matchup yours
Create a free account to compare predictions, track your picks and unlock one Premium match view each week.
Three models + ConsensusAdvanced marketsDetailed match analysis
1One free unlock each weekNo payment card required for the weekly report.
Create a free account
Series Predictions
SillySilly GamingCTBC Flying Oyster Academy


FastTree
· free model
Uncertain
SillySilly Gaming50.7%
CTBC Flying Oyster Academy49.3%
Sign in to track this pick
Head-to-Head & Form
SillySilly GamingElo Rating
1646
Tournament Record
3-2
(10-5)
Overall Record
21W - 11L (65.6%)
Current Streak
2L
H2H Win Rate
39.4%
VS
CFO AcademyElo Rating
1564
Tournament Record
4-1
(10-6)
Overall Record
49W - 52L (48.5%)
Current Streak
6L
H2H Win Rate
60.6%
Main Prediction Drivers
Impact = how much this feature shifts the model's win probability. The value below each name is how much better the favored team is on that feature.
1
Early GameEarly GameA combined early-game signal blending gold, CS, and XP differentials at the 15-minute mark.
SillySilly Gaming +473
Impact
17%
SillySilly Gaming
2
Win Rate
SillySilly Gaming +17.1% WR
Impact
12.9%
SillySilly Gaming
3
Vision ControlVision ControlA combined vision signal blending vision score, vision wards per minute, and vision efficiency.
SillySilly Gaming +110
Impact
9.4%
SillySilly Gaming
4
Elo Rating
SillySilly Gaming +122 Elo
Impact
9%
SillySilly Gaming
5
Expected Win RateExpected Win RateThe model's expected win probability based on Elo difference alone.
SillySilly Gaming +16.9% expected WR
Impact
6.8%
SillySilly Gaming
6
Opponent Avg Elo
CFO Academy +0.035
CFO Academy leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward SillySilly Gaming.
Impact
4.3%
Counts for SillySilly Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
7
Team StrengthTeam StrengthA combined team strength signal blending overall win rate, KDA, and gold per minute.
SillySilly Gaming +776
Impact
3.1%
SillySilly Gaming
8
Elo CompositeElo CompositeA combined Elo signal that blends raw Elo, expected win rate, and the interaction between them.
SillySilly Gaming +74
Impact
2.4%
SillySilly Gaming
9
Objective ControlObjective ControlA combined objective control signal blending dragons, heralds, and barons taken per game.
SillySilly Gaming +288
Impact
2.4%
SillySilly Gaming
10
Schedule StrengthSchedule StrengthThe average Elo of opponents this team has faced. A 60% win rate against strong opponents is more impressive than against weak ones.
CFO Academy +0.035
CFO Academy leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward SillySilly Gaming.
Impact
2.1%
Counts for SillySilly Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
Scouting Report
SillySilly Gaming
BLUE
Higher rated overall
Stronger win record (66%)
Cleaner teamfighting (better KDA)
Better gold generation
Stronger early game (gold lead at 15)
CFO Academy
RED
Well-rounded profile