VCSPlayoffs

Saigon 9Gaming Esports vs TP.HCM SN CyberCore Esports - VCS

Sep 26, 09:00·Bo5
Series Edge Premium Bo5Patch 16.18Updates after every game
Saigon 9Gaming Esports
Better draft expected Premium Better draft expectedWhich roster is expected to get the better draft on this patch, from pool depth and the current meta. A house read, not any single model's number. See which side, and whether the market agrees
TP.HCM SN CyberCore Esports
Champion pool edge Each roster's go-to champions for this series and how deep its meta pool runs.
Series Predictions
Saigon 9Gaming Esports
TP.HCM SN CyberCore Esports
FastTree · free model
Uncertain
Saigon 9Gaming Esports50.0% TP.HCM SN CyberCore Esports50.1%
Head-to-Head & Form
9Gaming Esports
Elo Rating 1484
Tournament Record 0-1 (1-2)
Overall Record 17W - 25L (40.5%)
Current Streak 2L
H2H Win Rate 43.1%
VS
SN CyberCore Esports
Elo Rating 1514
Tournament Record 0-1 (1-2)
Overall Record 28W - 46L (37.8%)
Current Streak 1L
H2H Win Rate 56.9%
Main Prediction Drivers
Impact = how much this feature shifts the model's win probability. The value below each name is how much better the favored team is on that feature.
1
Early GameEarly GameA combined early-game signal blending gold, CS, and XP differentials at the 15-minute mark.
9Gaming Esports +291
Impact 21.7%
9Gaming Esports
2
Objective ControlObjective ControlA combined objective control signal blending dragons, heralds, and barons taken per game.
9Gaming Esports +191
Impact 15.9%
9Gaming Esports
3
Elo Rating
SN CyberCore Esports +46 Elo
Impact 9.9%
SN CyberCore Esports
4
Head-to-Head History
SN CyberCore Esports +13.8% WR
SN CyberCore Esports leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward 9Gaming Esports.
Impact 6.4%
Counts for 9Gaming Esports The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
5
Expected Win RateExpected Win RateThe model's expected win probability based on Elo difference alone.
SN CyberCore Esports +6.6% expected WR
Impact 5.6%
SN CyberCore Esports
6
Upset RateUpset RateHow often this team wins as the Elo underdog - captures clutch factor / ability to beat stronger teams.
9Gaming Esports +0.8%
9Gaming Esports leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward SN CyberCore Esports.
Impact 5.6%
Counts for SN CyberCore Esports The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
7
Combat PowerCombat PowerA combined combat signal blending damage to champions, damage per minute, and teamfight power.
SN CyberCore Esports +109
Impact 5.5%
SN CyberCore Esports
8
Elo CompositeElo CompositeA combined Elo signal that blends raw Elo, expected win rate, and the interaction between them.
SN CyberCore Esports +23
Impact 5.3%
SN CyberCore Esports
9
Vision ControlVision ControlA combined vision signal blending vision score, vision wards per minute, and vision efficiency.
SN CyberCore Esports +78
Impact 4.6%
SN CyberCore Esports
10
Schedule StrengthSchedule StrengthThe average Elo of opponents this team has faced. A 60% win rate against strong opponents is more impressive than against weak ones.
9Gaming Esports +0.012
9Gaming Esports leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward SN CyberCore Esports.
Impact 4.4%
Counts for SN CyberCore Esports The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
Scouting Report
9Gaming Esports BLUE
Stronger early game (gold lead at 15)
Stronger first tower pressure
Better dragon control
SN CyberCore Esports RED
Higher rated overall