Sep 5, 09:00·Bo5
Sign in to track this pick
Series Predictions
Beijing JDG EsportsInvictus Gaming
FastTree
· free model
Head-to-Head & Form
JD GamingElo Rating
1616
Tournament Record
0-1
(1-3)
Overall Record
158W - 142L (52.7%)
Current Streak
1L
H2H Win Rate
49.1%
VS
Invictus GamingElo Rating
1586
Tournament Record
1-0
(3-0)
Overall Record
126W - 117L (51.9%)
Current Streak
3W
H2H Win Rate
50.9%
Main Prediction Drivers
Impact = how much this feature shifts the model's win probability. The value below each name is how much better the favored team is on that feature.
1
Win Streak
Invictus Gaming +4 games
Impact
25.6%
Invictus Gaming
2
Combat Power
Combat PowerA combined combat signal blending damage to champions, damage per minute, and teamfight power.
Invictus Gaming +381
Impact
25.4%
Invictus Gaming
3
Head-to-Head History
Invictus Gaming +1.9% WR
Invictus Gaming leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward JD Gaming.
Impact
13.3%
Counts for JD Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
4
Vision Control
Vision ControlA combined vision signal blending vision score, vision wards per minute, and vision efficiency.
JD Gaming +334
Impact
12.3%
JD Gaming
5
Elo Rating
JD Gaming +30 Elo
Impact
5.1%
JD Gaming
6
Expected Win Rate
Expected Win RateThe model's expected win probability based on Elo difference alone.
JD Gaming +4.4% expected WR
Impact
5.1%
JD Gaming
7
Elo Composite
Elo CompositeA combined Elo signal that blends raw Elo, expected win rate, and the interaction between them.
JD Gaming +15
Impact
5.1%
JD Gaming
8
Team Strength
Team StrengthA combined team strength signal blending overall win rate, KDA, and gold per minute.
Invictus Gaming +271
Invictus Gaming leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward JD Gaming.
Impact
3.2%
Counts for JD Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
9
Objective Control
Objective ControlA combined objective control signal blending dragons, heralds, and barons taken per game.
Invictus Gaming +78
Invictus Gaming leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward JD Gaming.
Impact
3.2%
Counts for JD Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
10
Early Game
Early GameA combined early-game signal blending gold, CS, and XP differentials at the 15-minute mark.
Invictus Gaming +102
Invictus Gaming leads this stat - but weighed with the rest of this matchup, it shifts the model toward JD Gaming.
Impact
1.7%
Counts for JD Gaming
The model weighs every driver together rather than one at a time. A team can lead a single stat here and still see the full matchup point the other way - this row is being outweighed by the rest of the picture, not ignored.
Scouting Report
JD Gaming
BLUE
Higher rated overall
Invictus Gaming
RED
Cleaner teamfighting (better KDA)
Higher damage output
Stronger early game (gold lead at 15)